"Snapshot” POST-IMPRESSIONIST PICTURE THEORY by Emily Nathan
Unlike Edgar Degas and Thomas Eakins, who are known to have used their photos as preparatory studies, the artists in this show made snapshots the way tourists might, often with “no artistic intention.” Their images are full of technical errors, are badly framed and out of focus, and were clearly taken on the spur of the moment. This group of artist-photographers “did not require photography to serve their art. . . . they took photographs without preconceptions and only later realized they could use them as visual sources.” This fact doesn’t mean the pictures were without beauty and visual interest, not at all, nor does it deny photography’s influence on the way artists saw the world at the turn of the century. Indeed the “snapshot,” made feasible in 1881 with the arrival of ultrasensitive negative plates that permitted very short exposure times, allowed for “l’instantané,” or “instantaneity” as it was called, which appealed to late-19th-century artists as an avant-garde and naturalistic method of capturing movement. As Michel Frizot writes in the show’s 248-page catalogue, published by Yale University Press, it “was a representation of the activities of living beings . . . and as such. . . enhanced the visual acuity of painters.” The show also addressed the influence of painting on photography, notably citing Maurice Denis’ return to a beach 17 years after creating the painting On the Beach (Two Girls against the Light),to re-create it with a camera. Beyond its visual interest, this revelatory, thoroughly researched exhibition stands as a pioneering examination of what it calls the “fundamental distinction” between painting and photography.
Credit Visuals | Bottom ^
Maurice Denis, On the Beach (Two Girls against the Light), 1892, private collection, Germany
|